Overview

A balanced budget that protects services and the County's workforce while confronting a challenging fiscal environment.

The Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 Budget totals $1.29 billion across all funds, including an $844.1 million General Fund. It is a balanced budget that protects the County's 2,682.28 full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce, maintains essential services, and continues targeted investments in housing, roads, homelessness reduction, and organizational modernization all while confronting the most challenging fiscal environment the County has faced in over a decade.

This budget arrives at a difficult moment. Unprecedented federal policy changes under H.R. 1 are reducing funding for programs that thousands of Santa Cruz County families depend on, and those reductions will deepen in the years ahead. At the same time, the County faces a structural imbalance between its ongoing costs, driven primarily by labor, benefits, and inflation and the revenues available to support them. That gap, which was projected at $23.2 million when budget development began, is forecast to exceed $67 million in subsequent years absent corrective action.

The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget achieves balance through shared restraint across every department, combined with $43.0 million in one-time funding from General Fund reserves and department trust funds. This approach allows the County to avoid layoffs, preserve core services, and maintain investments in community priorities. It buys time — but it is not a long-term solution. The one-time resources used to balance this budget will not be available next year, and the structural work ahead will require sustained effort from the Board of Supervisors, County staff, community partners, and the public.

All Funds Budget
$1.29B
FY 2026-27 Proposed
General Fund
$844.1M
Expenses
Funded FTE
2,682.28
Net −57.88 from FY 25-26
Reserve Level
10.4%
Down from 12.5%

General Fund at a Glance

The General Fund is the County's primary operating fund. It supports the broadest range of County services, from public safety and health and human services to land use, parks, and general government operations.

FY 2024-25 Actual FY 2025-26 Adopted FY 2025-26 Est. Actuals FY 2026-27 Proposed
Revenues$738.2M$816.2M$809.0M$812.9M
Expenses$771.9M$824.3M$825.2M$844.1M
Revenues Less Expenses($33.7M)($8.1M)($16.2M)($31.2M)
General Fund Revenues vs. Expenses — Five-Year Trend
Actuals FY 2020-21 through FY 2024-25; Adopted FY 2025-26; Proposed FY 2026-27. Hover any point for detail. Click legend to toggle series.
Source: County of Santa Cruz Variance Analysis, April 2026.

The $31.2 million gap between General Fund revenues and expenses is closed through the planned use of one-time fund balance, department trust funds, and assigned reserves. This is not deficit spending in the traditional sense — it is a deliberate, Board-authorized strategy to use available resources to bridge the gap while longer-term solutions are developed. However, it reduces the County's reserve position and cannot be repeated at this scale.

How the Budget Is Balanced

The County entered the FY 2026-27 budget development cycle facing a projected General Fund deficit of $23.2 million. Through a combination of departmental restraint, targeted revenue increases, and the strategic use of one-time resources, the budget before the Board is balanced.

Departmental Restraint

Every County department contributed to closing the gap. Key actions include:

  • Countywide hiring freeze on vacant General Fund positions
  • Elimination of a net total 57.88 vacant positions across departments, reducing the County's funded workforce from 2,743.16 to 2,682.28 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions — a reduction of 2.1 percent
  • Targeted line-item reductions in services and supplies, professional services, and operating costs
  • Increased salary savings rates in departments with higher-than-average vacancy rates

The largest staffing impacts fall in the Health Services Agency (23.1 FTE reduced) and the Human Services Department (25.5 FTE reduced), reflecting both the scale of those departments and the disproportionate fiscal pressure created by federal funding reductions. No employees are laid off.

Revenue Actions

  • Reimbursment rate increase at County Health Centers, aligning reimbursement rates for clinical services with actual costs and improving revenue recovery
  • Parking fee pilot at County Parks, creating a new, modest revenue source while managing visitor demand
  • Enhanced revenue projections where supported by current-year performance, including intergovernmental revenue adjustments and updated fee schedules

One-Time Resources

The most significant balancing action is the use of $30.8 million in one-time funding from General Fund reserves, combined with $12.2 million from department trust funds and other non-recurring sources — $43.0 million in one-time resources in total. The overwhelming share of one-time funds is directed at preserving safety net services in Health and Human Services — programs facing the most acute pressure from H.R. 1 impacts.

This approach has a cost. General Fund reserves are projected to decline from 12.5 percent to 10.4 percent of General Fund expenses — below the level most financial advisors recommend for a county of this size and risk profile. These resources will not be available in FY 2027-28, meaning the projected out-year deficit of more than $67 million will need to be addressed through more permanent measures: structural revenue solutions, service level adjustments, or both.

General Fund Reserves

General Fund reserves are the County's principal fiscal cushion against economic downturns, natural disasters, and unanticipated expenses. The Board of Supervisors has established a 15 percent reserve target — a level the County has not yet achieved. The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget draws reserves down from 12.5 percent to 10.4 percent of General Fund expenses — a level below the Board-adopted 15 percent target and significantly below the 28 percent California peer county average.

Component FY 2025-26 Adopted Balance1 Proposed Use of One-Time Funds Projected FY 2026-27 Increases FY 2026-27 Ending Balance
Board Directed Reserves$45.3M($9.5M)$35.8M
Department Assigned Reserves$62.5M($21.4M)$10.3M2$51.5M
Subtotal — General Fund Reserves$107.8M($30.8M)$10.3M$87.3M
Other Departmental Funds3($12.2M)
Total One-Time Funds Used($43.0M)
  1. FY 2025-26 adopted balances reflect post-ACFR adjustments from the FY 2024-25 year-end true-up.
  2. Reflects projected FY 2026-27 deposits to the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) program reserve.
  3. Department trust funds are non-General Fund balances tracked at the department level; they are not consolidated as General Fund reserves but are used as one-time funding sources to support General Fund activities.
FY 26-27 Projected
10.4%
Down from 12.5% in FY 25-26
Board-Adopted Target
15.0%
$126.6M at FY 26-27 expense level
CA Peer County Average
28.0%
$236.3M at FY 26-27 expense level

Why Reserves Matter

Reserves serve three functions: cash flow management within the fiscal year, absorption of unexpected costs (disasters, FEMA reimbursement delays, mid-year federal or State actions), and a signal to credit rating agencies and financial partners that the County is managing for sustainability. The gap between the County's projected reserve level and both the Board-adopted target and California peer county average constrains all three of these functions and reduces the County's flexibility to respond to future fiscal shocks.

The Path Back to Target

Rebuilding reserves to the 15 percent target will require a combination of revenue growth, cost restraint, and structural fiscal alignment in FY 2027-28 and beyond. The County Executive Office is developing a multi-year plan to restore reserves to the Board-adopted target while managing the concurrent structural imbalance discussed in the Risks section below.

Revenue Outlook

General Fund revenues are budgeted at $812.9 million in the Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget. The revenue forecast reflects an economy that is still functioning but growing more slowly, with limited upside and increasing sensitivity to downside risk.

Revenue by Major Source (General Fund)

Revenue Source FY 2025-26 Adopted FY 2026-27 Proposed Change ($) Change (%)
Intergovernmental Revenues$458.9M$445.8M($13.1M)−2.9%
Taxes$198.3M$207.2M$8.9M4.5%
Charges for Services$104.7M$105.8M$1.1M1.0%
Licenses, Permits, and Franchise Fees$17.5M$17.6M$0.1M0.6%
Other Financing Sources$9.8M$12.8M$3.0M30.6%
Fines, Forfeitures, and Assessments$8.6M$9.3M$0.7M8.1%
Use of Money and Property$12.5M$7.5M($5.0M)−40.0%
Miscellaneous Revenues$6.0M$7.0M$1.0M16.7%
Total General Fund Revenues$816.2M$812.9M($3.3M)−0.4%
FY 2026-27 Proposed General Fund Revenues by Source
Hover any segment for dollar amount and share. Click legend to toggle categories.
Source: Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget.

Property tax revenues, the County's most stable discretionary revenue source, are expected to grow modestly, supported by high assessed values and limited housing supply in the local market. The median home price in Santa Cruz County ended 2025 at $1.3 million, sustaining assessed value growth even as transaction volume remains constrained. Growth is driven more by assessments than by new sales activity.

Sales tax performance has softened as consumer spending moderates. Elevated living costs, cautious household behavior, and a growing reliance on higher-income consumers for retail activity introduce greater volatility risk. Growth is expected to remain positive but restrained.

Intergovernmental revenues — the General Fund's single largest source — decline modestly, reflecting reduced federal funding flows through State programs. This is a direct consequence of H.R. 1 policy changes and is expected to deepen in future years.

Transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues continue to benefit from resilient visitor demand but remain sensitive to broader economic and discretionary spending trends.

Expense Drivers

General Fund expenses total $844.1 million in the Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget, an increase of $19.8 million — or 2.4 percent — over the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget.

Expenses by Major Category (General Fund)

Expense Category FY 2025-26 Adopted FY 2026-27 Proposed Change ($) Change (%)
Salaries and Employee Benefits $413.8M $446.7M $32.9M 8.0%
Services and Supplies $224.5M $232.2M $7.7M 3.4%
Other Charges $116.0M $112.0M ($4.0M) −3.5%
Services and Supplies — ISF $30.0M $38.1M $8.1M 27.0%
Other Financing Uses $44.3M $19.0M ($25.3M) −57.1%
Contingencies $9.6M $11.0M $1.4M 14.6%
Fixed Assets $1.0M $1.0M ($0.02M) −2.0%
Intrafund Transfers ($14.9M) ($15.9M) ($1.0M) 6.7%
Total General Fund Expenses $824.3M $844.1M $19.8M 2.4%
Expenses by Major Category — Five-Year Comparison
Toggle view below. Hover any bar for detail.
Source: Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget; historical actuals from County Variance Analysis.

Salaries and Employee Benefits are the dominant cost driver, accounting for 52.9 percent of total General Fund expenses. Growth of $32.9 million — or 8.0 percent — reflects negotiated cost-of-living adjustments across all bargaining units ($9.5 million in General Fund COLA costs), step increases for eligible employees, rising health insurance premiums, and increased retirement contribution rates. While CalPERS investment returns have improved — reporting a preliminary 11.6 percent return in FY 2024-25 — the effect on employer contribution rates lags by several years, providing modest relief in the near term but not enough to offset the pace of total compensation growth.

This is the core of the County's structural challenge. Labor costs are growing faster than the County's revenue base can sustainably support, and this dynamic will not reverse without deliberate intervention.

Internal Service Fund (ISF) charges increase significantly as County departments absorb higher costs for centralized services including facilities, fleet, technology, and risk management. Some of this increase reflects cost allocations for new county-wide systems such as Workday and OpenGov, expansion of county owned office spaces, and the ongoing transition of functions into the General Services Department and updated cost allocation methodologies.

Contingencies are budgeted at $11.0 million, representing 1.3 percent of General Fund expenses. This includes the standard 1 percent operational contingency, Measure K reserves designated for Board priorities (environment and parks, housing, disaster response), and a Board allocation for vacation rental impacts and district-level allocations.

Expenses by Service Area

The General Fund supports four major service areas, plus County financing and debt service operations.

Service Area FY 2025-26 Adopted FY 2026-27 Proposed Change ($) Change (%) Share of GF
Health and Human Services$515.0M$526.3M$11.3M2.2%62.4%
Public Safety and Justice$216.5M$216.6M$0.1M0.05%25.7%
General Government$39.6M$41.5M$1.9M4.8%4.9%
Land Use and Community Service$44.3M$41.8M($2.5M)−5.6%5.0%
County Financing (Debt, Contingency, GCR)$8.9M$17.9M$9.0M101.1%2.1%
Total$824.3M$844.1M$19.8M2.4%100%
Where the Money Goes — General Fund Expenses by Service Area
Toggle between single-year share and five-year trend. Hover for dollar detail. Click legend items to isolate a service area.
Source: County of Santa Cruz Variance Analysis, April 2026.

Health and Human Services accounts for 62.4 percent of all General Fund expenses and is the area most directly affected by federal policy changes. The Health Services Agency and Human Services Department together absorb the greatest share of H.R. 1 impacts, as reduced federal funding flows into programs that serve the County's most vulnerable residents — including Medi-Cal, public health, behavioral health, and social services. Nearly all of the one-time reserve use in this budget is directed at sustaining these programs.

Public Safety and Justice expenses are essentially flat year-over-year, reflecting the combined effects of position reductions, line-item restraint, and the establishment of the Alternate Defender Division within the Public Defender's Office — a structural change expected to reduce reliance on costly outside counsel over time.

Staffing

The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget funds 2,682.28 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions — a net reduction of 57.88 positions, or 2.1 percent, from the current year.

Service Area FY 2025-26 Funded FTE FY 2026-27 Proposed FTE Net Change
Health and Human Services 1,269.85 1,221.25 −48.6
Public Safety and Justice 674 675 +1.0
General Government 346.65 341.15 −5.5
Land Use and Community Service 449.66 444.88 −4.78
Total 2,740.16 2,682.28 −57.88
Funded FTE — 10-Year Trend by Service Area
Stacked by service area; total bar height equals total funded FTE. Click any service area in the legend to toggle. Hover for exact values (rounded). FY 2017-18 through FY 2026-27.
Source: CEO Summary, All Dept FTE, April 2026.

All position eliminations target vacant positions. No employees are laid off. The budget also implements a countywide hiring freeze for vacant General Fund positions, with limited exceptions for critical public safety and direct-service roles.

The staffing reductions are concentrated in Health and Human Services, where the Health Services Agency eliminates 23.1 vacant FTE and the Human Services Department eliminates 26.2 FTE, with all filled positions absorbed through attrition, reassignment, or program restructuring.

Key Investments

Despite the fiscal constraints, this budget preserves and advances several key priorities:

Artificial Intelligence and Organizational Modernization

The budget funds the County's AI Elevation and Standardization Workplan 2026, including enterprise licensing, staff training, technical support, and pilot projects designed to improve efficiency and service delivery — making the best and highest use of County staff to solve problems and improve services. The Streamline Santa Cruz County initiative continues permitting process improvements, including a major update to the Santa Cruz County Code to implement objective standards and reduce peer reviews. The creation of the Alternate Public Defender's Office also contributes to long-term sustainability by improving service delivery while managing costs.

Roads, Infrastructure, and Economic Development

The budget maintains the Measure K investment of $2.0 million in road paving, culvert repair, and striping — essential quality-of-life services for residents in the unincorporated area. Board-directed Measure K investments in the environment and parks also continue, with $1.0 million allocated across the five supervisorial districts ($200,000 per district). Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) moves forward, providing the County a long-term mechanism to capture value from growth and direct it toward public infrastructure and economic development.

Housing, Homelessness, and Essential Services

The 701 Ocean Street Housing Viability Study, funded by $1.0 million in Measure K, advances work on one of the County's most significant affordable housing sites. The budget continues the $1.0 million Measure K investment in homelessness reduction programs, which has contributed to a significant reduction in the number of unhoused individuals. Collective of Results and Evidence-Based (CORE) Investments contracts are preserved, maintaining the County's commitment to data-driven community services.

Risks and the Path Forward

The Board of Supervisors should be aware of several material risks embedded in or surrounding this budget:

H.R. 1 — Federal Funding Uncertainty Will Deepen

The escalating impacts of H.R. 1 on County health and human services programs and the community are expected to deepen materially in FY 2027-28 and beyond. The one-time resources used to buffer those impacts in this budget will not be available next year. Reductions flow through State programs into Medi-Cal, public health, behavioral health, and social services funding streams — the programs serving the County's most vulnerable residents.

FEMA reimbursement remains at risk. The County continues to carry significant costs related to disaster recovery from prior storm events. Delays or denials in federal reimbursement would place additional pressure on the General Fund and the Roads Fund.

State May Revision — Downward Pressure on County Revenues

The State's May Revision is expected to reflect continued fiscal tightening, including enrollment freezes, premium implementations, and benefit adjustments affecting Medi-Cal populations. The County will monitor the Governor's May Revision closely for triggers that would further reduce program funding and create new unfunded mandates. State actions that shift cost to counties without accompanying revenue will compound the County's structural challenge.

Reserves Are Diminished

The planned use of General Fund reserves reduces the County's fiscal cushion from 12.5 percent to 10.4 percent — a level that limits the County's ability to absorb unexpected costs or revenue shortfalls.

The Structural Imbalance Persists

The most significant ongoing structural drivers are labor cost growth — required to retain a trained and skilled workforce and remain competitive in the job market — and the escalating impacts of H.R. 1 on County health and human services programs. This budget closes a $23.2 million structural gap using measures that are largely non-recurring. The projected gap for FY 2027-28 exceeds $67 million. Closing that gap will require a combination of new revenues, cost reductions, and potentially difficult decisions about the County's long-term service model.

The State Must Step Up

Counties cannot absorb the fiscal consequences of federal policy changes alone. The State should protect safety net services by providing direct funding to counties for H.R. 1 impacts in FY 2026-27 and every year that follows. This is a major realignment of funding and costs that requires the State to participate in the solution. The County will pursue every responsible mechanism available to align revenues with community expectations.

Looking Ahead

This budget is a bridge. It preserves the County's ability to function, protects the workforce, and maintains core services — while buying the time needed to pursue structural reform.

The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget preserves the County's ability to function, protects the workforce, and maintains core services — while buying the time needed to pursue structural reform. That work — on revenues, costs, and the County's long-term service model — begins in earnest now.

This budget reflects the professionalism and commitment of every County employee who contributed to the effort. And it reflects a candid assessment of where the County stands: stable enough to plan, constrained enough to act, and committed to building a more resilient fiscal future.

The Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget was submitted to the Board of Supervisors by County Executive Officer Nicole D. Coburn on May 5, 2026. Budget hearings are scheduled at the following dates and locations:

  • Wednesday, June 10, 2026 — South County Government Center, Watsonville
  • Thursday, June 11, 2026 — Board Chambers, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz
  • Wednesday, June 24, 2026 — South County Government Center, Watsonville (Final Budget Hearing Day)

The Final Budget is expected to be adopted on September 29, 2026.